Key result
This review summarizes the principles, clinical data, and controversies of intravascular lithotripsy for treating coronary, peripheral artery, and valvular calcifications.
Why the study?
Management of intracoronary calcium remains challenging, and a knowledge gap exists regarding which calcium treatment devices to select.
How does intravascular lithotripsy compare to alternative devices for treating coronary, peripheral artery, and valvular calcifications?
How does intravascular lithotripsy compare to alternative devices for treating coronary, peripheral artery, and valvular calcifications?
This review summarizes the principles, clinical data, and practical application of intravascular lithotripsy for treating calcified lesions in coronary, peripheral, and valvular interventions.
Knowledge gap in ICC device selection persists; leaves open optimal IVL strategy pending comparative trials.
Management of intracoronary calcium (ICC) continues to be a challenge for interventional cardiologists. There have been significant advances in calcium treatment devices. However, there still exists a knowledge gap regarding which devices to choose for the treatment of ICC. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the principles of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and clinical data. The technique of IVL will then be compared to alternative calcium treatment devices. Clinical data will be reviewed concerning the treatment of coronary, peripheral artery and valvular calcifications. Controversies to be discussed include how to incorporate IVL into your practice, what is the best approach for treating calcium subtypes, how to approach under-expanded stents, what is the ideal technique for performing IVL, how safe is IVL, whether imaging adds value when performing IVL, and how IVL fits into a treatment program for peripheral arteries and calcified valves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gruslova et al. (2023) conducted a review in Coronary, peripheral artery, and valvular calcifications. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) vs. Alternative calcium treatment devices was evaluated. This review summarizes the principles, clinical data, and controversies of intravascular lithotripsy for treating coronary, peripheral artery, and valvular calcifications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: