Key result
Endurance-trained older men had significantly greater endothelium-dependent dilation compared with sedentary controls (8.9% vs 5.7%, P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does endurance training improve endothelial vasoreactivity in healthy older men?
Cross-Sectional (n=35)
Does endurance training improve endothelial vasoreactivity in healthy older men?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.9% vs 5.7%
p-value: p=0.02
Endurance training in older men is associated with enhanced endothelium-dependent and independent vasoreactivity, suggesting preserved vascular function.
Endurance training linked to better endothelial function in older men; leaves open causal effects and clinical adoption pending trials.
Using external vascular ultrasound, we measured brachial artery diameter (Diam) at rest, after release of 4 min of limb ischemia, i. e., endothelium-dependent dilation (EDD), and after sublingual nitroglycerin, i.e., non-endothelium-dependent dilation (NonEDD), in 35 healthy men aged 61-83 yr: 12 endurance athletes (A) and 23 controls (C). As anticipated, treadmill exercise maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2 max)) was significantly higher in A than in C (40. 2 +/- 6.6 vs. 27.9 +/- 3.8 ml. kg(-1). min(-1); respectively, P < 0. 0001). With regard to arterial physiology, A had greater EDD (8.9 +/- 4.2 vs. 5.7 +/- 3.5%; P = 0.02) and a tendency for higher NonEDD (13.9 +/- 6.7 vs. 9.7 +/- 4.2%; P = 0.07) compared with C. By multiple linear regression analysis in the combined sample of older men, only baseline Diam (beta = -2.0, where beta is the regression coefficient; P = 0.005) and VO(2 max) (beta = 0.23; P = 0.003) were independent predictors of EDD; similarly, only Diam (beta = -4.0; P = 0.003) and VO(2 max) (beta = 0.27; P = 0.01) predicted NonEDD. Thus endurance-trained older men demonstrate both augmented EDD and NonEDD, consistent with a generalized enhanced vasodilator responsiveness, compared with their sedentary age peers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rywik et al. (1999) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=35). Endurance training vs. Sedentary controls was evaluated on Endothelium-dependent dilation (EDD) (p=0.02). Endurance-trained older men had significantly greater endothelium-dependent dilation compared with sedentary controls (8.9% vs 5.7%, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: