Key result
Pre-diabetic patients undergoing CABG for AMI had a higher 12-month MACE rate than normoglycemic patients (9.1% vs 3%, p<0.05), while metformin use in pre-diabetics significantly lowered MACE.
Why the study?
Pericoronary fat over-inflammation may destabilize coronary plaques in pre-diabetic patients, who might have altered SGLT2, leptin, and SIRT6 expression during AMI, but the prognostic impact and metformin's effects remained to be evaluated.
Does metformin therapy improve 12-month MACE and pericoronary fat inflammatory markers in pre-diabetic patients undergoing CABG for AMI?
Cohort
Does metformin therapy improve 12-month MACE and pericoronary fat inflammatory markers in pre-diabetic patients undergoing CABG for AMI?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 3%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Metformin therapy in pre-diabetic patients undergoing CABG for AMI is associated with reduced pericoronary fat inflammation and lower 12-month MACE rates.
Metformin may lower MACE in pre-diabetic post-CABG patients; extends cardioprotective data beyond diabetes and warrants dedicated trials.
Background and purpose: pericoronary fat over-inflammation might lead to the development and destabilization of coronary plaque in patients with pre-diabetes (PDM). Notably, pericoronary fat could over-express the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) and leptin, along with decreased sirtuin 6 (SIRT6) expression in PDM vs. normoglycemic (NG) patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, in the current study, we evaluated inflammatory markers, SGLT2, SIRT6, and leptin levels in pericoronary fat and, subsequently, 12-month prognosis comparing PDM to NG subjected to CABG for AMI. In addition, we evaluated in PDM patients the effects of metformin therapy on SIRT6 expression, leptin, and SGLT2 levels, and assessed its beneficial effect on nitrotyrosine and inflammatory cytokine levels. Methods: we studied AMI patients referred for CABG, divided into PDM and NG-patients. PDM patients were divided into never-metformin users and metformin users. Finally, we evaluated major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at a 12-month follow-up. Results: the MACE was 9.1% in all PDM and 3% in NG patients (p < 0.05). Metformin users presented a significantly lower MACE rate in PDM than never-metformin users (p < 0.05). PDM showed higher inflammatory cytokines, 3-nitrotyrosine levels, SGLT2, and leptin content, and decreased SIRT6 protein levels in pericoronary fat compared to NG-patients (p < 0.05). PDM never-metformin-users showed higher SGLT2 and leptin levels in pericoronary fat than current-metformin-users (p < 0.05). Conclusions: metformin therapy might ameliorate cardiovascular outcomes by reducing inflammatory parameters, SGLT2, and leptin levels, and finally improving SIRT6 levels in AMI-PDM patients treated with CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sardu et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI). Pre-diabetes vs. Normoglycemia was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (p=< 0.05). Pre-diabetic patients undergoing CABG for AMI had a higher 12-month MACE rate than normoglycemic patients (9.1% vs 3%, p<0.05), while metformin use in pre-diabetics significantly lowered MACE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: