PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 14, 2005Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology173 citations

Measuring Patient Acceptance of Implantable Cardiac Device Therapy:

View Full Paper
JBJason BurnsESEva R. SerberSKStephen G. Keim

Key Result

The Florida Patient Acceptance Survey demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.83), with pacemaker patients reporting the highest acceptance (mean 85.4) vs ICD-AT (81.1) and ICD (76).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=238)

Structured PICO

Is the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) a valid and reliable measure of patient acceptance for implantable cardiac devices?

P
Population
238 patients (mean age 69 years, 38% female) with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, implantable atrioverter defibrillators, or pacemakers.
E
Exposure
Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS)
O
Outcome
Psychometric validation of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) including internal consistency and validitypatient reported

The Florida Patient Acceptance Survey is a valid and reliable tool for assessing patient acceptance of cardiac implantable devices in clinical and research settings.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient acceptance of implantable device therapy has been established as an important outcome but the operationalization and validation of a measure of patient acceptance of implantable device therapy has not been fully completed. This study sought to validate a new measure of patient acceptance of cardiac implantable devices called the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS). METHODS: The sample consisted of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD; n = 58), and implantable atrioverter defibrillator (ICD-AT; n = 96), and pacemaker (PM, n = 84) patients. Mean age of all participants was 69 years; they were mostly male (62%) and married (75%). The final FPAS comprised 15 items with four consistent factors: Return to Function, Device-Related Distress, Positive Appraisal, and Body Image Concerns. RESULTS: The total FPAS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83), and internal consistency for each of the subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.89. The FPAS demonstrated convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity when compared to other self-report measures of QOL, atrial symptoms, depression, and anxiety. A total FPAS score can be formed and between group comparisons with this sample indicated that ICD patients report a high level of acceptance (mean = 76), ICD-AT patients report a significantly higher level of acceptance (mean = 81.1), and PM patients reported the highest level of patient acceptance (mean = 85.4) of these implantable device groups. CONCLUSION: This initial psychometric investigation of the FPAS suggests that the FPAS may be useful in both clinical and research settings to assess patient acceptance of implantable cardiac devices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Burns et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Implantable cardiac devices (n=238). Implantable cardiac devices (ICD, ICD-AT, PM) was evaluated on Internal consistency and validity of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS). The Florida Patient Acceptance Survey demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.83), with pacemaker patients reporting the highest acceptance (mean 85.4) vs ICD-AT (81.1) and ICD (76).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a658f5765807505f87cfee3https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.40134.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper