Key result
The shortened, three-factor, 12-item version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and was superior to two-factor versions.
Why the study?
The Florida Patient Acceptance Survey is the gold standard for assessing ICD device acceptance, but its most optimal factor structure remains an open question.
Observational (n=478)
Yes
p-value: p=<0.001
The shortened 12-item Florida Patient Acceptance Survey is a valid and reliable tool for assessing device acceptance in Danish ICD patients.
Supports abbreviated 12-item FPAS for ICD acceptance assessment; extends validation in large Danish prospective cohort.
BACKGROUND: Patient device acceptance reflects the psychological adjustment to living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and is an important outcome for ICD patients. The Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) is the gold standard for assessing patient device acceptance; however, the most optimal factor structure of the FPAS is an open question. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of FPAS by conducting head-to-head comparison tests between the proposed factor structures using prospective data from a national, Danish randomized controlled trial (ACQUIRE-ICD). METHODS: The sample included 478 first-time ICD recipients (mean age 59.6 ± 11.6 years), predominantly male (83.1%), assessed at ICD implantation and at 1-year follow-up (n = 364; 76.2%), completing the FPAS and measures of anxiety, depression, and Type D personality. RESULTS: (33) = 125.05, p < 0.001). Both were superior to the two-factor versions (CFI = 0.707 and 0.843). The psychometric properties of the abbreviated 12-item version and original 15-item version were satisfactory with a moderate fit to the data at both ICD implantation and at 1-year follow-up, along with good internal reliability and divergent validity. CONCLUSIONS: In a large prospective cohort from a national Danish ICD study, the shortened, three-factor, 12-item version of the FPAS appears to be the most suitable version. The FPAS demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties at both ICD implantation and 1-year follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skov et al. (2025) conducted an observational in First-time implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients (n=478). Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) vs. Alternative factor structures was evaluated on Psychometric properties and factor structure of the FPAS (p=<0.001). The shortened, three-factor, 12-item version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and was superior to two-factor versions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: