Key result
Imipramine reduced the total number of ventricular ectopic beats and the incidence and duration of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in rats following acute coronary artery ligation.
Why the study?
Does imipramine reduce ventricular arrhythmias in a rat model of acute coronary artery ligation compared to procainamide or solvent?
Does imipramine reduce ventricular arrhythmias in a rat model of acute coronary artery ligation compared to procainamide or solvent?
Imipramine demonstrates potential antiarrhythmic utility by suppressing ventricular arrhythmias in a rat model of acute myocardial ischemia.
Preclinical efficacy in rat ligation model supports further mechanistic work; leaves open human translation.
The potential antiarrhythmic activity of imipramine against ventricular arrhythmias induced by coronary artery ligation in rats has been investigated and compared with procainamide. Imipramide (1 and 5 mg/kg-1) or procainamide (5 and 10 mg/kg-1) or solvent were injected intravenously 30 min before ligation. Imipramine reduced the total number of ventricular ectopic beats as well as the incidence and duration of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The drug did not significantly affect the blood pressure but reduced the heart rate. The antiarrhythmic activity of imipramine is postulated to be due to a quinidine-like effect and/or alpha-adrenergic blocking activity. The study confirms the potential utility of imipramine as an antiarrhythmic drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Mahdy et al. (1990) studied Ventricular arrhythmias induced by coronary artery ligation. Imipramine vs. Procainamide (5 and 10 mg/kg-1) or solvent was evaluated on Total number of ventricular ectopic beats, incidence and duration of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Imipramine reduced the total number of ventricular ectopic beats and the incidence and duration of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in rats following acute coronary artery ligation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: