Key result
Centralized 3-dimensional ultrasound reading of carotid plaque volume demonstrated high reproducibility, with an inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.964.
Why the study?
Does a central reading procedure for 3-dimensional ultrasound provide reproducible measurements of carotid atherosclerotic plaque volume?
Observational (n=105)
Blinded
Randomized reading assignment
Yes
Does a central reading procedure for 3-dimensional ultrasound provide reproducible measurements of carotid atherosclerotic plaque volume?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.964
Standardised central 3D ultrasound reading protocols yield highly reliable and reproducible measurements of carotid plaque volume, supporting their use in large multicentre trials.
Centralized 3D US plaque volume readings achieve high reproducibility (ICC >0.96); supports standardized protocols in multicenter trials but needs prospective outcome validation.
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) has emerged as the predominant approach for evaluating the progression of carotid atherosclerosis and its response to treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of a central reading procedure concerning plaque volume (PV), measured by 3D US in a multinational US trial. METHODS: Two data sets of 45 and 60 3D US patient images of plaques (mean PV, 71.8 and 39.8 mul, respectively) were used. PV was assessed by means of manual planimetry. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was applied to determine reader variabilities. The repeatability coefficient (RC) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used to investigate the effect of number of slices (S) in manual planimetry and plaque size on measurement variability. RESULTS: Intra-reader variability was small as reflected by ICCs of 0.985, 0.967 and 0.969 for 3 appointed readers. The ICC value generated between the 3 readers was 0.964, indicating that inter-reader variability was small, too. Subgroup analyses showed that both intra- and inter-reader variabilities were lower for larger than for smaller plaques. Mean CVs were similar for the 5S- and 10S-methods with a RC of 4.7 microl. The RC between both methods as well as the CVs were comparatively lower for larger plaques. CONCLUSION: By implementing standardised central 3D US reading protocols and strict quality control procedures highly reliable ultrasonic re-readings of plaque images can be achieved in large multicentre trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ludwig et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Carotid atherosclerosis (n=105). Centralized 3-dimensional ultrasound reading was evaluated on Inter-reader variability (Intraclass correlation coefficient) (ICC 0.964). Centralized 3-dimensional ultrasound reading of carotid plaque volume demonstrated high reproducibility, with an inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.964.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: