Key result
Masked nocturnal hypertension was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events compared to controlled blood pressure (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.00-2.46).
Why the study?
There was no information regarding the potential association between cardiovascular disease event risks and masked nocturnal hypertension defined by home blood pressure monitoring.
Does masked nocturnal hypertension increase the risk of cardiovascular disease events in high-cardiovascular-risk participants?
Cohort (n=2,745)
Does masked nocturnal hypertension increase the risk of cardiovascular disease events in high-cardiovascular-risk participants?
Masked nocturnal hypertension identified via home blood pressure monitoring is an independent predictor of future cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.
Masked nocturnal hypertension by home BP may raise CVD risk in high-risk patients; leaves open whether monitoring should guide therapy.
There is no information regarding the potential association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) event risks and masked nocturnal hypertension defined by home blood pressure (BP) monitoring. We sought to examine this association in a general practice population. For this purpose, we used data from the J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure) Nocturnal BP Study, which recruited 2745 high-cardiovascular-risk participants (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [10.4] years; 48.7% men; 82.7% on antihypertensive medications). Nocturnal home BPs (HBPs) were measured at 2:00, 3:00, and 4:00 AM using a validated, automated HBP device for 14 consecutive days. The average (SD) of nocturnal HBP measures was 17.1 (13.5). The percentages of participants with controlled BP (nocturnal HBP <120/70 mm Hg and average morning and evening BP <135/85 mm Hg), daytime hypertension (nocturnal HBP <120/70 mm Hg and average morning and evening BP ≥135/85 mm Hg), masked nocturnal hypertension (nocturnal HBP ≥120/70 mm Hg and average morning and evening BP <135/85 mm Hg), and sustained hypertension (nocturnal HBP ≥120/70 mm Hg and average morning and evening BP ≥135/85 mm Hg) were 31.7%, 7.9%, 26.7%, and 33.7%, respectively. During a median 7.6-year follow-up (19 519 person-years), 162 CVD events occurred. The cumulative incidence of CVD events was higher in those with masked nocturnal hypertension and sustained hypertension than in the controlled BP group. Results from Cox models suggested that masked nocturnal hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.00-2.46]) and sustained hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.26-3.06]) were associated with increased risk of CVD events. Participants with masked nocturnal hypertension defined by HBP monitoring are at high risk of future CVD events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujiwara et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in High cardiovascular risk (n=2,745). Masked nocturnal hypertension vs. Controlled blood pressure was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease events (adjusted HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.00-2.46). Masked nocturnal hypertension was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events compared to controlled blood pressure (adjusted HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.00-2.46).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: