Key result
Female sex was independently associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes, with a higher prevalence in females aged 45-60 years (54.5% vs 46.9%, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is the earliest sign of diabetic cardiomyopathy, but the association between sex differences and left ventricular diastolic function in type 2 diabetes remains to be clarified.
Is female sex associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,778)
No
Is female sex associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 54.5% vs 46.9%
p-value: p=<0.05
In patients with type 2 diabetes without known heart disease or hypertension, female sex is independently associated with a higher prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
May inform sex-specific diastolic dysfunction screening in type 2 diabetes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Aim: Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a subset of heart disease that is directly associated with diabetes, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is the earliest sign. We aimed to investigate the association between sex differences and left ventricular diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study included patients with type 2 diabetes who visit the National Metabolic Management Center (MMC) at the First People's Hospital of Yunnan from 2018 to 2021. Patients with hypertension, history of heart disease or ejection fraction <50% were excluded from the study. Logistic regression was used to analyze their associations. Results: A total of 1778 patients were included in the study. The study included 1205 (70%) males and 573 (30%) females. Compared with males, females had higher total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels but lower diastolic pressure, body mass index (BMI), visceral fat area, HbA1c, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine and triglyceride. Females had a relatively higher ejection fraction than males (68.17 ± 6.055 vs 67.5 ± 6.096, P < 0.05). More female patients than male patients in the age group of 45-60 years old had left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (female vs male, 54.5% vs 46.9%, P < 0.05). We also found that females were independently associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, after adjusting for important clinical factors. Conclusion: Left ventricular diastolic function might be worse in female patients with type 2 diabetes. Further study is needed to verify the underlying mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=1,778). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (p=<0.05). Female sex was independently associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes, with a higher prevalence in females aged 45-60 years (54.5% vs 46.9%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: