Key result
Transthoracic echocardiography-derived epicardial adipose tissue thickness demonstrated a moderate-to-strong correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance-derived volumetric EAT (r = 0.77).
Why the study?
Although CMR and cCT quantify EAT volume, their cost, availability, and radiation restrict longitudinal use, while TTE's validity as a surrogate and clinical role remain incompletely defined.
Does TTE-derived EAT thickness correlate with volumetric EAT and associate with major cardiovascular phenotypes in adults?
Meta-Analysis
Does TTE-derived EAT thickness correlate with volumetric EAT and associate with major cardiovascular phenotypes in adults?
TTE-derived EAT thickness shows a moderate-to-strong correlation with CMR-derived volumetric EAT and is consistently associated with major cardiovascular phenotypes, supporting its potential as an accessible imaging biomarker.
TTE-derived EAT thickness offers a practical surrogate for volumetric assessment; leaves open routine clinical adoption pending standardization and prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is a metabolically active visceral fat depot implicated in cardiometabolic and cardiovascular (CV) disease. Although cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (cCT) enable accurate volumetric quantification of EAT, their cost, limited availability, and-particularly for cCT-radiation exposure, restrict their use in preventive and longitudinal settings. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is widely accessible and radiation-free, but its validity as a surrogate of volumetric EAT assessment and its broader clinical role remain incompletely defined. OBJECTIVES: To systematically synthesize disease-specific evidence linking TTE-derived EAT thickness with major CV phenotypes and to quantitatively assess its association with volumetric EAT measured by CMR or cCT. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed and PubMed Central (January 2000-December 2025) identified adult studies evaluating associations between TTE-derived EAT thickness and coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation (AF), or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and correlations between TTE-derived EAT thickness and CMR- or cCT-derived EAT volume. Correlation coefficients were pooled using a random-effects model after Fisher's z-transformation. An exploratory meta-analysis assessed associations with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: Seventeen disease-specific studies consistently demonstrated associations between increased TTE-derived EAT thickness and CAD severity, AF burden and recurrence, and adverse HFpEF phenotypes. Five validation studies were included; four comparing TTE with CMR were pooled, yielding a moderate-to-strong correlation (r = 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.93; p < 0.01; I² = 92.9%). Several studies reported associations between TTE- EAT thickness and cCT-derived EAT parameters. However, only one cCT study met our predefined criteria for inclusion in the quantitative validation analysis, whereas the remaining cCT studies were retained in the qualitative synthesis because of substantial methodological heterogeneity in cCT acquisition, segmentation approaches, and outcome definitions. Exploratory prognostic analysis suggested a directional association between increased TTE-derived EAT thickness and MACE. CONCLUSIONS: TTE-derived EAT thickness correlates with volumetric EAT and is consistently associated with major CV phenotypes. Standardization and prospective outcome-driven validation are required before routine clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pala et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiovascular disease and epicardial adipose tissue assessment. Transthoracic echocardiography-derived epicardial adipose tissue thickness vs. CMR- or cCT-derived EAT volume was evaluated on Correlation between TTE-derived EAT thickness and CMR-derived EAT volume (r = 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.93, p=<0.01). Transthoracic echocardiography-derived epicardial adipose tissue thickness demonstrated a moderate-to-strong correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance-derived volumetric EAT (r = 0.77).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: