Key result
Moderate-intensity isokinetic exercise elicited higher changes in heart rate (9.8 vs 6.3 bpm, P=0.01) and rate pressure product than low-intensity exercise in patients with CAD.
Why the study?
Few studies have examined metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses to submaximal isokinetic exercises among CAD patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programs.
Does isokinetic exercise at low and moderate intensities produce safe cardiorespiratory responses compared to CPET in patients with CAD?
Observational (n=8)
Does isokinetic exercise at low and moderate intensities produce safe cardiorespiratory responses compared to CPET in patients with CAD?
Isokinetic exercise at low and moderate intensities elicits cardiorespiratory responses below the anaerobic threshold, supporting its use as a safe strategy in cardiac rehabilitation for CAD patients.
Isokinetic exercise elicits measurable responses in CAD rehab; leaves open comparative efficacy in controlled trials.
Introduction Exercise training using an isokinetic dynamometer is an alternative for improving muscle strength in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Few studies have shown metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses to submaximal isokinetic exercises in patients in cardiac rehabilitation programs. Objective To describe cardiorespiratory responses at two intensities of isokinetic exercise. Additionally, we compared the cardiorespiratory responses of isokinetic exercise with data from the incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Methods Eight individuals with CAD (61.7 ± 6.6 years) performed the following tests: 1) CPET on a treadmill; 2) Peak torque test (five repetitions) and fatigue resistance test (20 repetitions) of knee flexion-extension at angular speeds of 120°/s and 180°/s; 3) Two sets of 20 repetitions were performed at 30–40% (low-intensity, LI) and 50–60% (moderate-intensity, MI) of peak torque at angular speeds of 120°/s and 180°/s, using an isokinetic dynamometer. During the exercises, the individuals were connected to an expired gases analyzer with simultaneous monitoring of the electrocardiogram trace, heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production, and minute ventilation (VE). The differences (∆) between the peak measurements during exercises and the baseline values were calculated. Results Both LI and MI produced cardiorespiratory responses below the anaerobic threshold (82.8 ± 8.1% of HRmax and 74.4 ± 9.6% of VO2peak) compared to the CPET data ( P < 0.01). MI showed higher ∆ HR (9.8 ± 5.5 vs. 6.3 ± 4.6 bpm; P = 0.01), ∆ rate pressure product (3015 ± 2286 vs. 1957 ± 1932 mmHg·bpm; P = 0.01), and ∆VE (10.2 ± 6.2 vs. 6.9 ± 7 L·min-1; P = 0.03) than LI at the angular velocity of 180°/s. Conclusion These results suggest that this isokinetic exercise protocol may be used as a strategy for cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with CAD. Level of evidence IV; Case series.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ribeiro et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=8). Moderate-intensity isokinetic exercise vs. Low-intensity isokinetic exercise (30-40% of peak torque) was evaluated on Change in heart rate (∆ HR) at an angular velocity of 180°/s (p=0.01). Moderate-intensity isokinetic exercise elicited higher changes in heart rate (9.8 vs 6.3 bpm, P=0.01) and rate pressure product than low-intensity exercise in patients with CAD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: