Key result
MICT increases energy consumption ~82% over eight sessions after acute myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
The prescription and individualization of cardiovascular rehabilitation programs after acute myocardial infarction rely on identifying patients' deconditioning to physical effort.
Does moderate-intensity continuous training on a sensorized ergometer bicycle improve energy consumption and metabolic equivalents in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction?
Does moderate-intensity continuous training on a sensorized ergometer bicycle improve energy consumption and metabolic equivalents in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction?
Mean Difference: 139.64 (95% CI 117.44–161.84)
Absolute Event Rate: 407.91% vs 223.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
An individualized program of moderate-intensity continuous training safely and significantly improves physical effort capacity (energy consumption and METs) in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction.
The prescription of physical exercise and the individualization of cardiovascular rehabilitation (CVR) programs after acute myocardial infarction (MI) are based on identifying the degree of patients' deconditioning to physical effort.This bicentric, prospective, longitudinal, interventional, non-randomized, pilot study included 44 patients with acute MI who underwent at least eight sessions of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on a sensorized ergometer bicycle.The main aim of the study was to determine whether energy consumption and metabolic equivalents (METs) improved during MICT sessions within the RCV program.The average energy consumption increased progressively from 223.8 ± 125.97 kJ to 407.91 ± 189.87 kJ (P < 0.001), with significant differences starting with moment III to moment VIII, an evolution also reflected by the METs values, which increased from 3.47 ± 1.12 to 4.71 ± 1.39, becoming significant starting with moment III, the statistical significance being consolidated starting with moment IV in the final model.Male gender and maximum heart rate (max HR) were positively associated with both energy consumption and MET values.Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly associated only with energy consumption (β = 4.52; P = 0.003), while for METs it showed only a tendency toward significance (β = 0.03; P = 0.064).Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was significantly associated only with METs (β = 0.01; P < 0.001).Interindividual variability was significant for both energy consumption and METs, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.77 and 0.74, respectively.The increase in energy efficiency observed within the program suggests that patients presented a favorable cardiovascular adaptation to exercise and, implicitly, an improvement in both the level and efficiency of physical effort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andone et al. (2026) studied Acute myocardial infarction (MI) (n=44). Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) vs. Baseline (within-subject comparison) was evaluated on Energy consumption during MICT sessions (Moment VIII vs Moment I) (MD 139.64, 95% CI 117.44-161.84, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: