Experimental evaluation of extremity doses from accidental exposure to handheld XRF devices, indicating the need for stricter safety protocols.
This study experimentally evaluates extremity doses from unintentional exposure emitted by handheld X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzers. Although handheld XRF devices are widely used for material analysis, quantitative assessments of unintentional exposure remain limited. Mockup experiments were conducted using a Thermo Scientific NITON XLt 797 analyzer and a polymethyl methacrylate hand phantom equipped with radiophotoluminescent glass dosemeters (GD-302M). Spectrometric measurements were performed with a CdTe detector, and photon fluence spectra were unfolded using the MAXED code with Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System-generated response functions. The mean X-ray energy was 28.4 ± 0.03 keV, with characteristic molybdenum peaks at ~17.5 keV (Kα) and 19.6 keV (Kβ). For a typical 30-s analysis, the estimated personal dose equivalent Hp(0.07) at the point of contact was ~95 μSv. The Hp(0.07) on the dorsal side was roughly one-fifth of the palmar dose. Ambient dose equivalent rates measured directly from the XRF device may reach high enough to set radiation-controlled areas, underscoring the need for strict handling protocols. These findings demonstrate the importance of radiological protection education and awareness when using handheld XRF devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kowatari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: