Examines key teaching clarity dimensions influencing student ability and motivation, indicating important factors for instructors.
Instructional clarity is an effective teaching behavior that has consistently been linked to positive classroom outcomes. Because instructional clarity is multidimensional, college instructors should know which dimensions are most important for predicting student success. We asked 434 students to report on their experiences in a college classroom to investigate how five clarity dimensions (i.e., fluency, reducing working memory overload, interaction, coherence, and structure) predicted variables associated with students’ ability (i.e., organization and extraneous cognitive load) and motivation (i.e., perceptions of cost and self-efficacy) to process course material and to determine which dimensions were more (or less) important. Using dominance analysis and random forests, results indicated that all dimensions of instructor clarity were valuable. Reducing students’ working memory overload was deemed highly important for variables associated with students’ ability and motivation to process course information. Structure also stood out for its impact on variables associated with students’ ability to process course information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolkan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: