Qualitative study explores user experiences of an AI mental health app for anxiety, highlighting its strengths and design challenges.
Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent, yet access to effective psychological treatments remains limited. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled mental health applications offer a scalable and accessible means to bridge treatment gaps. This study qualitatively explored the experiences of adults with anxiety symptoms using PATH, an AI-enabled mental health intervention. Participants (N = 100) with moderate-to-severe anxiety were recruited via Prolific and engaged with PATH before providing feedback. A total of 67 participants completed the qualitative questions at the 2-week timepoint, and 51 participants completed a further questionnaire at the 8-week timepoint. Participants had a mean age of 39.84 (SD = 11.19). Most were born in the UK (89.6%), and reported their ethnicity as White (92.5%), Asian (3.0%), mixed (3.0%) and Black (1.5%). Many worked full-time (53.7%) or part-time (20.9%), and a minority (14.9%) were students. Data were analysed using Qualitative Descriptive Analysis. Four overarching themes emerged: (1) Key Reasons for Use; (2) Usability and Functionality; (3) Preferred In-App Interventions; and (4) Facilitators and Barriers to Sustained Engagement. Findings underscore the value of empathetic, personalised and readily available AI-enabled interventions for anxiety management, while also highlighting design challenges requiring refinement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Powell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: