This investigation reveals differing evaluations of leaders' mistakes based on gender, suggesting significant bias in leadership perceptions.
Female leaders still have to work harder to be seen as effective as male leaders (e.g., Kim et al., 2022 ; Rudman & Phelan, 2008 ). At the same time, recent high-profile cases suggest that women are also evaluated more strictly when showing ineffective leadership behaviors, as in the controversial case of misconduct involving former Max Planck director Nicole Boivin (e.g., Abbott, 2021 ; Von Bredow, 2021 ). Susan Trumbore, herself a director at Max Planck Institute, stated: “Female scientists in leadership positions are publicly accused and punished for misconduct in much higher percentages than their male peers” (Von Bredow, 2021 , para. 12).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krauth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: