Key result
High body roundness index is linked to ~17-fold higher odds of dysglycemia.
Why the study?
Does body roundness index associate with and discriminate dysglycemia in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=427)
No
Does body roundness index associate with and discriminate dysglycemia in adults?
Odds Ratio: 16.6 (95% CI 7.09–39.14)
Body roundness index is a strong, independent indicator of dysglycemia with discriminatory performance comparable to BMI and waist circumference.
Body roundness index is a novel anthropometric measure of body fat based on height and waist circumference, but its association with dysglycemia remains understudied. We aimed to assess the association and discriminatory performance of between body roundness index and dysglycemia among adult patients at outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to assess the association. A total of 427 adults aged ≥ 35 years were included in this study. The mean body roundness index of the study population was 4.22 ± 1.12. BRI was significantly associated with higher odds of dysglycemia. A graded increase in risk was observed across BRI quartiles, with participants in the highest quartile (Q4) showing markedly increased odds compared with Q1 (AOR: 16.6; 95% CI: 7.09–39.14). Similar associations were observed for prediabetes (Q4 vs. Q1: AOR: 11.39; 95% CI: 3.73–34.76) and type 2 diabetes (Q4 vs. Q1: AOR: 29.2; 95% CI: 9.84–86.59). A receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that it had good discriminatory ability for dysglycemia (AUC 0.813, 95% CI: 0.772–0.854). When compared with other anthropometric indices, BRI demonstrated a comparable AUC to BMI (0.810; 95% CI: 0.769–0.850) and waist circumference (0.833; 95% CI: 0.796–0.871). The optimal body roundness index cutoff was 4.17 (sensitivity 73.6%, specificity 79.2%), with sex-specific cutoffs of 4.02 for males and 4.17 for females. Body roundness index showed a strong, graded association with dysglycemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abraham et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in dysglycemia (n=427). Body roundness index vs. Lowest quartile (Q1) was evaluated on dysglycemia (AOR 16.6, 95% CI 7.09-39.14). Body roundness index in the highest quartile was associated with markedly increased odds of dysglycemia compared to the lowest quartile (AOR 16.6; 95% CI 7.09-39.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: