Technical review explores model parameters for reducing hallucinations and ensuring reliable generative AI systems.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), expose a dense and interacting set of architectural, optimization, and inference-time parameters that jointly determine factual reliability, adaptation quality, and reproducibility. This review develops an industry-oriented technical synthesis of those parameters under three operational goals: (i)~quantifying and reducing hallucination, (ii)~selecting fine-tuning controls for stable domain adaptation, and (iii)~constructing a functionally similar successor model. We formalize how temperature, nucleus and top-k sampling, repetition penalties, LoRA rank and scaling, learning-rate schedules, preference KL coefficients, retrieval depth, and context length reshape the predictive distribution. For each control we discuss mechanism, empirical failure modes, and recommended operating ranges. Parameter search is embedded inside the ModelSure validation methodology to enforce leakage-free train/validation/test discipline, metric selection under class imbalance, and bias--variance diagnosis. The paper concludes with consolidated tables, an algorithmic selection workflow, and a replication checklist suitable for industrial GenAI governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prateek Dutta (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: