Key result
Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring devices offer real-time estimation of blood pressure to help recognize and prevent intraoperative hypotension, though outcome data is still needed.
Why the study?
Does continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring improve postoperative outcomes in anesthetized subjects undergoing surgical procedures?
Does continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring improve postoperative outcomes in anesthetized subjects undergoing surgical procedures?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring may help recognize intraoperative hypotension better than intermittent cuffs, potentially reducing postoperative complications like myocardial or kidney injury.
Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most important variables evaluated during almost every medical examination. Most national anesthesiology societies recommend BP monitoring at least once every 5 min in anesthetized subjects undergoing surgical procedures. In most cases, BP is monitored non-invasively using oscillometric cuffs. Although the risk of arterial cannulation is not very high, the invasive BP monitoring is usually indicated only in the case of high-risk patients or in complex surgical procedures. However, recent evidence points out that when using intermittent BP monitoring short periods of hypotension may be overlooked. In addition, large datasets have demonstrated that even short periods of low BP (or their cumulative duration) may have a detrimental impact on the development of postoperative outcome including increased risk of acute kidney or myocardial injury development. Recently marketed continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring tools may help us to recognize the BP fluctuation without the associated burden of arterial cannulation filling the gap between intermittent non-invasive cuff and continuous invasive arterial pressure. Among others, several novel devices based either on volume clamp/vascular unloading method or on applanation tonometry are nowadays available. Moreover, several near-future smart technologies may lead to better hypotension recognition or even prediction potentially improving our ability to maintain BP stability throughout the anesthesia or surgical procedure. In this review, novel or emerging technologies of non-invasive continuous blood pressure assessment and their potential to improve postoperative outcome are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stenglova et al. (2017) conducted a review in Intraoperative hypotension. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure (CNBP) monitoring vs. Intermittent non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (NIBP) or invasive arterial cannulation was evaluated. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring devices offer real-time estimation of blood pressure to help recognize and prevent intraoperative hypotension, though outcome data is still needed.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: