Key result
Ginger chest compresses significantly increased heart rate variability (p<0.05), whereas mustard compresses significantly decreased heart rate variability (p<0.00036) in healthy subjects.
Why the study?
External applications like compresses are used in integrative medicine, but the effects of different warming chest compresses on cardiovascular regulation using HRV required investigation.
Do different warming chest compresses alter heart rate variability in healthy subjects?
Do different warming chest compresses alter heart rate variability in healthy subjects?
Warming chest compresses with ginger or mustard flour induce short-term autonomic relaxation or stress responses, respectively, but lack long-term effects on heart rate variability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory HRV changes with chest compresses in healthy subjects warrant caution; leaves open clinical relevance pending patient trials.
Background: In integrative medicine, complementary healing methods, such as external applications (massages, rhythmic rubs, and compresses), are part of the practice and clinical application and have proven their therapeutic effect in various fields. Objective: Aim of this exploratory, controlled, single-blinded study was to investigate the effects of three different warming chest compresses on cardiovascular regulation by analyzing heart rate variability (HRV) in healthy subjects. Methods: Over a period of 4 weeks, three different warming chest compresses (a hot water compress, a ginger powder compress, and a mustard flour compress) in 30 healthy subjects were analyzed. For all subjects, 48-h long-term electrocardiograms were recorded, and afterward, epochs of 5 min length extracted and analyzed by different linear and nonlinear HRV indices. Results: A moist chest compress did not result in any significant short- and long-term stimulation of the autonomic regulation, except for a short-term significant decrease in heart rate (meanNN, p < 0.05). Warm and moist chest compresses with ginger flour led to significantly increased HRV (sdNN, p < 0.05; symbolic dynamics2, p < 0.05) and its complexity (renyi4 entropy, p < 0.05) and a significant decrease in heart rate (meanNN, p < 0.00036), and thus to a short-term relaxation effect. In contrast, warm and moist chest compresses with mustard flour led to significantly decreased HRV and their complexity (time-, frequency-, and nonlinear dynamics domain, p < 0.00036), which can be interpreted as a stress reaction of the autonomous nervous system. Conclusions: The application of chest compresses led to short-term relaxation effects (ginger) as well as short-term stress effects (mustard) but not to any significant longer-term effect on HRV in healthy subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schulz et al. (2022) studied Healthy subjects (n=30). Warming chest compresses (ginger powder and mustard flour) vs. Hot water compress was evaluated on Cardiovascular regulation analyzed by heart rate variability (HRV) (p=<0.05). Ginger chest compresses significantly increased heart rate variability (p<0.05), whereas mustard compresses significantly decreased heart rate variability (p<0.00036) in healthy subjects.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: