Real-world study demonstrates that platinum-based chemotherapy shows meaningful activity in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, suggesting implications for treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) is frequently used after first-line enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), yet efficacy in this setting remains undefined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed an institutional database of 236 patients with mUC treated with enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab between October 2018 and December 2024 to identify those receiving second-line PBC. Responses were investigator-assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from the start of PBC; duration of response (DOR) was estimated from the first documented response. RESULTS: Of 62 patients treated with subsequent systemic therapy, 74% (n = 46) received PBC (carboplatin, n = 34; cisplatin, n = 12); nine patients (20%) then received maintenance avelumab. Median age was 73 years; 65% were male; 30% had upper-tract primary. Objective response rate (ORR) to first-line enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab was 41%. Median follow-up was 11 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2-not reached (NR)]. ORR to second-line PBC was 49% (22 of 45, 95% CI 34% to 64%), including two complete responses; median DOR was 5.2 months (95% CI 3.8-NR). Median PFS was 5 months (95% CI 3.6-6.6), and median OS was 12 months (95% CI 10-17). Outcomes did not differ between cisplatin and carboplatin (P > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, PBC after enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab demonstrated meaningful activity but modest durability. These findings may inform clinical management and future trial design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sternschuss et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: