Multicenter study shows treatment sequencing affects overall survival in metastatic bladder cancer, suggesting better initial therapies are needed.
• This multicenter real-world study describes treatment sequencing and outcomes in metastatic urothelial carcinoma before the widespread use of enfortumab vedotin-based combinations. • Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by avelumab maintenance achieved a median overall survival of 29 months in selected patients. • High attrition rates were observed between treatment lines, limiting access to subsequent therapies in routine practice. • Patients with ECOG performance status 2 to 3 had particularly poor outcomes despite aggressive treatment. • These findings support the early use of the most effective therapies and provide a real-world benchmark for interpreting recent phase III trials. The treatment landscape for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has rapidly evolved with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), FGFR-targeted therapies, antibody-drug conjugates, and more recently first-line enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab. In many countries, this combination is not yet available, and the standard of care (SOC) remains platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by ICI. Real-world data on treatment sequencing and attrition across therapy lines in unselected populations are limited. We analyzed patients with mUC treated between January 2020 and December 2023 across 4 French oncology centers. Eligible patients had received at least 1 cycle of PBC. Overall survival (OS), treatment sequences, and attrition rates were assessed. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. A total of 180 patients were included (median age 72 years; 81% male; 84% urothelial carcinoma). All received first-line PBC; 127 (71%) were non-progressive and eligible for avelumab maintenance, but 24 (19%) did not receive it. Only 54 patients (64%) received second-line therapy, and 45 (25%) reached third-line treatment. Median OS was 22.4 months (95% CI: 17.2–26.7). Patients receiving PBC followed by avelumab maintenance achieved a median OS of 29.0 months, compared with 15.6 months for not reponsders PBC patients. Patients with ECOG 2 to 3 ( n = 36) had poor outcomes (median OS 7.2 months vs. 26.4 months for ECOG 0–1; P < 0.001). This study confirms the real-world effectiveness of contemporary treatment sequences, highlights significant attrition between therapy lines, and underscores the need for upfront use of effective agents, particularly in patients with poor performans status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moinard-Butot et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: