Formal calculi for obligation settlement and causal admissibility are verified, suggesting robust computation reliability.
This record freezes two formal calculi from the Boundary Information Theory (BIT) program, together with an independent second-engine verification pack. Contents: (1) BIT-CVC-001 v1.0 — Result-to-Use Causal Admissibility Calculus (PRECANONICAL_CLOSED, unchanged); (2) BIT-CVC-OSSC-001 R1 — Source-Oracle-Grounded Obligation Settlement Calculus (unchanged); (3) OSSC-001 R2 — independent second-engine verification, reconstruction of lemmas L1–L6, publication freeze; (4) CVC-001 v1.0 Annex — second-engine re-check, non-reopening; (5) BIT_CVC_Freeze_PACK.zip — both verification engines, receipts, SHA-256 manifest; (6–7) a load-bearing ablation test of the five CVC components with its own pack. Headline results: 124,871 machine checks, 0 failures, byte-deterministic (seed 20260725). OSSC: 8/8 theorems, 12/12 countermodels at expected labels, 8/8 mutants killed; six lemmas cited by R1's proof DAG but never stated are reconstructed and machine-checked (2,401 checks). CVC: theorems T1–T5 independently reproduced, including the a=−b joint-vs-marginal counterexample and the moving-sum bound (max lhs/bound 0.9615 over 20,000 càdlàg trials; symbolic residual identity via SymPy). Claim boundary: finite-model verification only — not proof-assistant mechanization (F6), not independent human review (F7); world anchoring untouched (no benchmark, no field data); component novelty collapses to standard prior art (RATS, W3C VC 2.0, SCITT, PROV, in-toto, speaks-for); the unified claim has passed only a Stage-1 screening. The branch is frozen; a handover map for successors is in R2 §7 (Lean mechanization order, human review, systematic prior-art review, world anchoring, distributed runtime). Documents: CC-BY-4.0. Code inside the packs: MIT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bùi Quang Trịnh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: