Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recent approaches to variability have focused on the rank ordering of linguistic objects (e.g. noun-phrase transformations, environments of phonological reduction rules) or sociolinguistic objects (e.g. speakers, speech communities). These one-dimensional orderings can take various forms, such as implicational scales, squishes, or the ranking of variable constraints. It is suggested here that sometimes a higher dimensional configuration might better represent the variation. Computer-based heuristic procedures, notably multidimensional scaling techniques, are available for investigating the dimensionality of large data sets. In applying such methods to some well-known data, we confirm the one-dimensionality of Ross' collection of tests of noun-phrasiness as well as of the classes of fake NP's; and we confirm the two-dimensionality of the complementizer QUE-deletion rule in Montreal French. The linguistic environment of syllable-final S-reduction for speakers of Panamanian Spanish is shown to be three-dimensional. Phonological data are used to find two sociolinguistically significant dimensions of the speech community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sankoff et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: