Key result
Twelve months of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril significantly reduced 24-hour pulse pressure compared with high-dose lisinopril monotherapy (difference of -5 mm Hg, P=0.003).
Why the study?
Does dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril reduce ambulatory pulse pressure compared to high-dose lisinopril monotherapy in hypertensive type 2 diabetic subjects?
RCT (n=51)
double-masked
parallel-group
Does dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril reduce ambulatory pulse pressure compared to high-dose lisinopril monotherapy in hypertensive type 2 diabetic subjects?
Dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril significantly reduces 24-hour pulse pressure compared to high-dose lisinopril monotherapy in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.
Dual blockade may lower ambulatory PP more than high-dose ACEI; hypothesis-generating for outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Elevated pulse pressure (PP) is strongly associated with micro- and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetic patients. We examined the effect of 12 months of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril vs. high-dose lisinopril monotherapy on ambulatory PP in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients from the CALM (Candesartan and Lisinopril Microalbuminuria Trial) II study. METHODS: The CALM II study was a 12-month prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-masked study that included 75 type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects with hypertension. Participants were randomized for treatment with either high-dose lisinopril (40 mg once daily (o.d.)) or for dual blockade treatment with candesartan (16 mg o.d.) and lisinopril (20 mg o.d.). In this article, we present data from the post-hoc subgroup of 51 type 2 diabetic subjects who completed the full 12-month study period with successful ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements at both baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: Baseline 24-h BP values were similar in the two groups (24-h systolic BP (SBP) 130 +/- 12 vs. 127 +/- 9, 24-h diastolic BP (DBP) 77 +/- 8 vs. 74 +/- 7, and 24-h PP 53 +/- 8 vs. 53 +/- 7 mm Hg, for the lisinopril and dual blockade groups, respectively, P > 0.2 for all). Compared with lisinopril monotherapy, dual blockade treatment caused a highly significant reduction in 24-h PP levels (-5 +/- 5 mm Hg, P = 0.003), albeit the difference in the BP lowering effect between the treatment groups did not differ significantly for 24-h systolic (P = 0.21) or diastolic (P = 0.49) BP. Dual blockade treatment significantly lowered 24-h SBP (-5 +/- 11 mm Hg, P = 0.03), but not 24-h DBP (-2 +/- 7 mm Hg, P = 0.29), whereas in the lisinopril group, the opposite effect was observed (24-h SBP -1 +/- 9 mm Hg, P = 0.45, 24-h SBP -3 +/- 7 mm Hg, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril significantly reduced PP when compared with high-dose monotherapy with lisinopril. Larger studies are needed to confirm this observation, and to evaluate whether this effect translates into a greater degree of end-organ protection from dual blockade treatment than from conventional angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knudsen et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Hypertension and type 2 diabetes (n=51). Dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril vs. High-dose lisinopril monotherapy (40 mg o.d.) was evaluated on 24-h pulse pressure (PP) levels (MD -5 mm Hg, p=0.003). Twelve months of dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril significantly reduced 24-hour pulse pressure compared with high-dose lisinopril monotherapy (difference of -5 mm Hg, P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: