Key result
Pre-procedural arterial stiffness independently predicts blood pressure response after renal denervation.
Why the study?
Accurately selecting hypertensive candidates for renal denervation therapy is required, as one-third of patients who undergo the procedure are non-responders.
Does baseline arterial stiffness assessment predict blood pressure response to renal denervation in adults with resistant hypertension?
Systematic Review
Does baseline arterial stiffness assessment predict blood pressure response to renal denervation in adults with resistant hypertension?
Assessing arterial stiffness prior to renal denervation provides a viable, non-invasive method to distinguish between responders and non-responders, potentially optimizing patient selection and avoiding futile invasive procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Arterial stiffness assessment may refine renal denervation candidate selection; extends evidence for predictors of blood pressure response in resistant hypertension.
Background: Accurately selecting hypertensive candidates for renal denervation (RDN) therapy is required, as one-third of patients who undergo RDN are non-responders. We aimed to systematically review the literature on RDN response prediction using arterial stiffness assessment, optimizing the selection of patients referred for interventional blood pressure lowering procedures. Methods: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to retrieve potential eligible studies from the inception to 30 June 2022. Results: Ten studies were finally included in this systematic review. Studies consistently documented that invasive pulse wave velocity (PWV) was correlated with RDN’s significant success. Nevertheless, non-invasive ambulatory arterial stiffness index and PWV derived from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were independent predictors of blood pressure response (p = 0.04 and p < 0.0001). In some studies, magnetic resonance imaging parameters of arterial stiffness (ascending aortic distensibility, total arterial compliance) were correlated with blood pressure reduction (AUC = 0.828, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Assessing arterial stiffness prior to RDN predicted procedural success, since stiffness parameters were strongly correlated with a significant blood pressure response. Our endeavor should be tackled as a step forward in selecting appropriate hypertensive patients scheduled for RDN therapy. Non-invasive measurements could be an alternative to invasive parameters for response prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burlacu et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Resistant arterial hypertension. Arterial stiffness assessment (e.g., pulse wave velocity, ascending aortic distensibility) was evaluated on Blood pressure response to renal denervation (decreased 24 h SBP and DBP). Assessing arterial stiffness prior to renal denervation predicted procedural success, with stiffness parameters like pulse wave velocity and ascending aortic distensibility serving as independent predictors of blood pressure response.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: