Key result
Radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation reduced mean 24-h systolic ambulatory blood pressure by 8.4 mmHg/year (95% CI -14.5 to -2.3; P=0.007), though higher baseline CF-PWV attenuated this effect.
Why the study?
Although renal sympathetic denervation reduces blood pressure, one out of three patients does not exhibit a significant response, prompting investigation into noninvasive vascular stiffness indices as predictors.
Does baseline arterial stiffness modify the blood pressure response to radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension?
Does baseline arterial stiffness modify the blood pressure response to radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension?
Mean Difference: -8.4 (95% CI -14.5–-2.3)
p-value: p=0.007
Higher baseline carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is associated with a smaller reduction in systolic ambulatory blood pressure following renal sympathetic denervation, suggesting arterial stiffness could help identify RDN responders.
OBJECTIVES: Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP). However, one out of three patients does not exhibit a significant BP response to the therapy. This study investigates the association between noninvasive vascular stiffness indices and RDN-mediated BP reduction. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm pilot study, patients with systolic office BP at least 140 mmHg, mean 24-h systolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) at least 130 mmHg and at least three prescribed antihypertensive drugs underwent radiofrequency RDN. The primary efficacy endpoint was temporal evolution of mean 24-h systolic ABP throughout 1-year post RDN (measured at baseline and 3-6-12 months). Effect modification was studied for baseline ultrasound carotid-femoral and magnetic resonance (MR) pulse wave velocity (PWV), MR aortic distensibility, cardiac MR left ventricular parameters and clinical variables. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects models, and effect modification was assessed using interaction terms. RESULTS: Thirty patients (mean age 62.5 ± 10.7 years, 50% women) with mean 24-h ABP 146.7/80.8 ± 13.7/12.0 mmHg were enrolled. Following RDN, mean 24-h systolic ABP changed with -8.4 (95% CI: -14.5 to -2.3) mmHg/year ( P = 0.007). Independent effect modifiers were CF-PWV [+2.7 (0.3 to 5.1) mmHg/year change in outcome for every m/s increase in CF-PWV; P = 0.03], daytime diastolic ABP [-0.4 (-0.8 to 0.0) mmHg/year per mmHg; P = 0.03], age [+0.6 (0.2 to 1.0) mmHg/year per year of age; P = 0.006], female sex [-14.0 (-23.1 to -5.0) mmHg/year as compared with men; P = 0.003] and BMI [+1.2 (0.1 to 2.2) mmHg/year per kg/m 2 ; P = 0.04]. CONCLUSION: Higher CF-PWV at baseline was associated with a smaller reduction in systolic ABP following RDN. These findings could contribute to improve identification of RDN responders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeijen et al. (2023) studied Hypertension (n=30). Radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) was evaluated on Temporal evolution of mean 24-h systolic ABP throughout 1-year post RDN (MD -8.4, 95% CI -14.5 to -2.3, p=0.007). Radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation reduced mean 24-h systolic ambulatory blood pressure by 8.4 mmHg/year (95% CI -14.5 to -2.3; P=0.007), though higher baseline CF-PWV attenuated this effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: