Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validates MRI measures of portal pressure in liver disease, suggesting new diagnostic pathways.
Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for assessing portal hypertension (PH). We previously demonstrated that a bivariate MRI model combining liver T 1 and splenic artery velocity at 1.5 T correlates with HVPG. This study aimed to evaluate this model at 3 T and investigate additional splanchnic MRI measures as potential non‐invasive markers of portal pressure. Data from 40 participants (15 metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease [MASLD]/13 alcohol‐related liver disease [ArLD]/12 other, 55 ± 14 years) scanned at 1.5 T (retrospective) and 42 participants (21 MASLD/14 ArLD/7 other, 60 ± 12 years) scanned prospectively at 3 T who underwent clinical HVPG measurement were analysed. Liver and spleen iron‐corrected T 1 (c T 1 ) were acquired using fat‐suppressed spin‐echo echo‐planar T 1 mapping, and splanchnic haemodynamics were assessed using phase‐contrast MRI. Correlations between MRI parameters and HVPG were assessed, and previously derived univariate (liver c T 1 ) and bivariate (liver c T 1 + splenic artery velocity) models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for PH (HVPG ≥ 5 mmHg), clinically significant PH (CSPH; HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg) and increased risk of mortality (HVPG ≥ 15 mmHg). Liver c T 1 at 3 T showed a strong positive correlation with HVPG across the full range (0–23 mmHg; R = 0.73, p < 0.0001). After field adjustment, pooled 1.5 and 3 T liver c T 1 maintained a strong correlation with HVPG ( R = 0.76, p < 0.0001). At 3 T, the univariate liver c T 1 model outperformed the bivariate model, achieving AUROCs of 0.74, 0.86 and 0.91 for detecting PH, CSPH and HVPG ≥ 15 mmHg, respectively. In contrast, spleen c T 1 and superior mesenteric artery velocity correlated with HVPG only up to ~15 mmHg, after which values plateaued or declined. Liver c T 1 MRI at 3 T provides a surrogate of portal pressure across the full HVPG range and outperforms a previously proposed bivariate model. Spleen and splanchnic haemodynamic measures demonstrate a ceiling effect at higher portal pressures > 15 mmHg.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bradley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: