Randomized trial examines conflict management strategies' effects on organizational performance in oil and gas companies, highlighting their importance.
This study examined the relationship between conflict management strategies and organizational performance in oil and gas companies operating in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Specifically, the study investigated the effects of avoidance, accommodation, collaboration, and compromise strategies on employee productivity, operational efficiency, customer/client satisfaction, and workplace morale, respectively. The study was anchored on the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument Theory, Dual Concern Theory, Systems Theory, and Social Exchange Theory. A survey research design was adopted, and primary data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to a proportionately stratified random sample of 260 employees selected from a population of 741 employees across four major oil and gas companies in the Niger Delta. The validity of the instrument was established through expert review, while reliability was confirmed using the Cronbach Alpha coefficient. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were used to analyze respondents' demographic characteristics, while regression analysis was employed to test the hypotheses at a 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed that avoidance strategy had no significant effect on employee productivity. However, accommodation strategy had a significant positive effect on operational efficiency, collaboration strategy significantly enhanced customer/client satisfaction, and compromise strategy significantly improved workplace morale. The study concluded that constructive conflict management strategies contribute positively to organizational performance, whereas avoidance is less effective in improving productivity. It recommended that management of oil and gas companies should minimize the use of avoidance strategies and instead promote accommodation, collaboration, and compromise to enhance efficiency, customer satisfaction, employee morale, and overall organizational performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabriel Ameke (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: