Review examines mass spectrometry applications in allogeneic CAR-T cell manufacturing, suggesting improved quality and consistency.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy in hematological malignancies, yet their broader application is constrained by manufacturing complexity and variability, particularly in autologous settings. The development of allogeneic CAR T-cell therapies offers a promising alternative by enabling scalable, “off-the-shelf” production; however, these approaches introduce additional challenges related to donor variability, genome editing, and product consistency. Robust analytical strategies are therefore required to ensure safety, efficacy, and batch-to-batch reproducibility. Conventional analytical methods, such as flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, provide targeted, high-confidence measurements of predefined cellular and soluble markers but are inherently limited in their ability to capture the full molecular and functional complexity of CAR T-cell products. In current manufacturing paradigms, these assays are typically deployed as isolated quality control readouts rather than as components of an integrated control strategy that links donor variability, gene-editing material quality, in-process metabolic state, final product critical quality attributes, and clinical biomarker responses. In this context, mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a powerful platform for high-dimensional molecular characterization, enabling analysis of gene-editing reagents, proteins, metabolites, lipids, and both culture and spent-media composition across the CAR T-cell manufacturing workflow. In this review, we examine the various applications and tools of MS across key stages of the allogeneic CAR T-cell workflow, including donor characterization, analysis of gene-editing materials, in-process culture monitoring, drug product quality assessment, and post-infusion biomarker evaluation. Collectively, these approaches demonstrate the potential of MS-driven analytics to address current limitations in CAR T-cell manufacturing by improving process understanding, enabling comprehensive quality assessment, and supporting regulatory decision-making. The integration of MS into CAR T-cell workflows may ultimately facilitate the development of more consistent, scalable, and effective cell therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: