Key result
Mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation resulted in a 93.3% survival rate at 12 years, comparable to the general age-matched Dutch population.
Why the study?
What are the long-term survival, hemodynamic, and quality of life outcomes after primary isolated mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation?
Cohort (n=46)
No
What are the long-term survival, hemodynamic, and quality of life outcomes after primary isolated mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation?
Mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients with severe MR and normal LV function is safe and associated with excellent long-term survival, durable valve function, and quality of life comparable to the general population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports durable MV repair and preserved QoL in asymptomatic severe MR; leaves open randomized confirmation versus surveillance.
OBJECTIVES: Guidelines recommend surgical mitral valve repair in selected patients with asymptomatic severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR), but the role of repair remains a matter of debate. Survival analyses of operated asymptomatic patients have been reported, but long-term haemodynamics and quality of life are not well defined. The aim of this study was to report the long-term follow-up focusing on these aspects. METHODS: Our database identified patients who underwent primary isolated mitral valve repair for severe MR and were asymptomatic by New York Heart Association Class I and in sinus rhythm. To obtain sufficient length of follow-up, only patients operated on before 2006 returned for an echocardiogram and quality-of-life assessment (SF-36). RESULTS: Between May 1991 and December 2005, 46 asymptomatic patients with severe MR and a normal left ventricular function (ejection fraction >60%) were operated on. Mean age was 50.2 ± 13.2 years and 89% of patients were male. There were no operative deaths. Mean follow-up was 8.4 ± 3.9 years with 386 patient-years, survival was 93.3% at 12 years and comparable with the general age-matched Dutch population. Follow-up echocardiography showed that 92% had no to mild MR, and 3 patients had moderate MR. Left ventricular function was good/impaired/moderate in 66/29/5% of patients. Quality-of-life SF-36 assessment showed that mean physical and mental health components were 83 ± 17 and 79 ± 17, which was comparable with that of the general age- and gender-matched Dutch population. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that mitral valve repair for severe MR in asymptomatic patients is safe, and has satisfactory long-term survival with a low recurrence rate of MR, good left ventricular function, and excellent quality of life that is comparable with the general Dutch population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leeuwen et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic severe mitral valve regurgitation (n=46). Mitral valve repair vs. General age- and gender-matched Dutch population was evaluated on Survival at 12 years. Mitral valve repair in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation resulted in a 93.3% survival rate at 12 years, comparable to the general age-matched Dutch population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: