Exploratory study examines public space dynamics in Shanghai, revealing diverse forms of publicness.
In the context of researching public space in non-Western contexts, the paper seeks to explore an analytical framework that examines public space within contextual embeddedness. The framework combines a space–order publicness model and a typology approach. It is then empirically tested using public-space cases in Shanghai, drawing on data from observation and desktop research. By interpreting these cases with a new typology of public space comprising symbolic public space, entrepreneurial public space, community public space, and spontaneous public space, I argue that to examine public spaces as embedded in their unique contextual complexities, it is important to see publicness as a layered quality and public spaces on the ground as comprising varying compositions of different ideal public spaces (rather than public space ideals). This research contributes to existing scholarship by de-Westernizing publicness and offering an alternative perspective for interpreting public spaces in a non-Western urban context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jingyi Zhu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: