Randomized trial examines redshift evolution of acceleration scale in galaxies, indicating significant molecular gas impact.
Context. Ciocan et al. [2026a] report the first measurement of a redshift evolution of the characteristic acceleration scale a0of the radial acceleration relation (RAR), from 79 star-forming galaxies at 0.33 < z < 1.44 in the MUSE Hubble Ultra DeepField. They obtain a0|z∼1 = 2.38+0.12−0.10 × 10−10 m s−2 and, for a linear parametrisation, a1 = 1.59+0.11−0.10 × 10−10 m s−2 (95% CI). Aims. Their baryonic acceleration is built from a stellar disk and an atomic gas component only; molecular gas is notmodelled. Ciocan et al. flag the resulting mass systematic but test only redshift-independent offsets. Because the moleculargas fraction rises steeply with redshift, the omitted mass carries a gradient, and it is the gradient that produces a spurious trend. Methods. Using the public Ciocan et al. catalogue and the Tacconi et al. [2018] scaling relation evaluated per galaxy fromthe catalogue redshift, stellar mass and star-formation rate, I compute the missing molecular mass and propagate it throughthe RAR. I then remove the dependence on any particular scaling relation by reducing the correction to a single parameter,the logarithmic slope γ ≡ d log µmol/d log(1 + z), and scan it. Results. The missing mass grows from a median MH2 /M⋆ = 0.51 in the lowest-redshift quartile to 0.97 in the highest.The correction removes 82% of the binned trend in absolute a1 and 77% of the fractional evolution a0(z4)/a0(z1), whichfalls from 1.362 to 1.082; the implied power-law index drops from (1 + z) 0.80 to (1 + z) 0.20. A 4000-draw Monte Carlo over the scaling normalisation, its slope, and the assumed atomic ratio gives a median residual of 21% of the published trend, consistent with zero in 97% of realisations and never above 80%. Only γ < 1.06 would leave half the evolution intact; the adopted relation gives γ = 2.84. The correction also brings the implied baryonic Tully–Fisher zero-point shift from −0.10 to −0.02 dex, in line with the no-evolution result of Jeanneau et al. [2026]. Conclusions. a1 is not a robust physical quantity in this dataset. A high-redshift RAR measurement at this precision is limitedby the baryonic mass budget, not by the kinematics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikheil Rusishvili (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: