Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual analysis examines water governance in Jammu and Kashmir, highlighting claims overlooked by the Indus Waters Treaty.
The Indus basin has emerged as a geopolitical hotspot in South Asia, driven by the enduring water conflict between India and Pakistan, as outlined in the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960. While the IWT remains a vital cooperative mechanism, it neglects the rights and perspectives of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). Through the conceptual analysis of the treaty and the ARIA model of stages of dialogue, this article delves into the J&K perspective on the IWT by examining historical debates in both the J&K assembly and the Indian Parliament, the water sector and its management mechanisms in the region. Highlighting public response, findings argue that the treaty overlooks J&K's legitimate claims over the Indus waters, as the river traverses the region before entering Pakistan‐Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK). J&K deems the IWT unjust and indifferent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: