Key result
Machine learning combining ultrasound elastography, homodyned-K maps, and B-mode gray levels accurately detected large lipid areas in carotid plaques (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.80-0.92).
Why the study?
Does combining multiple quantitative ultrasound features with machine learning improve the characterization of carotid artery plaques compared to single ultrasound methods?
Cross-Sectional (n=66)
Does combining multiple quantitative ultrasound features with machine learning improve the characterization of carotid artery plaques compared to single ultrasound methods?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.90 (95% CI 0.80-0.92)
Combining multiple quantitative ultrasound features using machine learning significantly improves the accuracy of characterizing carotid artery plaque vulnerability and composition.
Combined QUS methods may refine carotid plaque characterization; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging methods, including elastography, echogenicity analysis, and speckle statistical modeling, are available from a single ultrasound (US) radio-frequency data acquisition. Since these US imaging methods provide complementary quantitative tissue information, characterization of carotid artery plaques may gain from their combination. Sixty-six patients with symptomatic ( n = 26 ) and asymptomatic ( n = 40 ) carotid atherosclerotic plaques were included in the study. Of these, 31 underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to characterize plaque vulnerability and quantify plaque components. US radio-frequency data sequence acquisitions were performed on all patients and were used to compute noninvasive vascular US elastography and other QUS features. Additional QUS features were computed from three types of images: homodyned-K (HK) parametric maps, Nakagami parametric maps, and log-compressed B-mode images. The following six classification tasks were performed: detection of 1) a small area of lipid; 2) a large area of lipid; 3) a large area of calcification; 4) the presence of a ruptured fibrous cap; 5) differentiation of MRI-based classification of nonvulnerable carotid plaques from neovascularized or vulnerable ones; and 6) confirmation of symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients. Feature selection was first applied to reduce the number of QUS parameters to a maximum of three per classification task. A random forest machine learning algorithm was then used to perform classifications. Areas under receiver-operating curves (AUCs) were computed with a bootstrap method. For all tasks, statistically significant higher AUCs were achieved with features based on elastography, HK parametric maps, and B-mode gray levels, when compared to elastography alone or other QUS alone ( ). For detection of a large area of lipid, the combination yielding the highest AUC (0.90, 95% CI 0.80-0.92, ) was based on elastography, HK, and B-mode gray-level features. To detect a large area of calcification, the highest AUC (0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96, ) was based on HK and B-mode gray level features. For other tasks, AUCs varied between 0.79 and 0.97. None of the best combinations contained Nakagami features. This study shows the added value of combining different features computed from a single US acquisition with machine learning to characterize carotid artery plaques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cardinal et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Carotid atherosclerotic plaques (n=66). Machine learning combining multiple quantitative ultrasound features vs. Single quantitative ultrasound features was evaluated on Detection of a large area of lipid (AUC 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-0.92). Machine learning combining ultrasound elastography, homodyned-K maps, and B-mode gray levels accurately detected large lipid areas in carotid plaques (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.80-0.92).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: