Why the study?
Choosing among NOACs is complicated due to a lack of head-to-head trials, and several special situations were not adequately studied in dedicated clinical trials.
How should clinicians select and dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for patients in special clinical situations?
How should clinicians select and dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for patients in special clinical situations?
This position article provides clinical guidance on selecting the appropriate NOAC and dose for patients in special situations that lack dedicated clinical trial data.
Informs NOAC selection and dosing in special situations; extends trial data to populations lacking dedicated RCTs.
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. In large clinical trials comparing the NOACs with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were at least as effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism, but were associated with less intracranial bleeding. In addition, the NOACs are more convenient to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Consequently, the NOACs are now replacing VKAs for these indications, and their use is increasing. Although, as a class, the NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile compared with VKAs, choosing among them is complicated because they have not been compared in head-to-head trials. Therefore, selection depends on the results of the individual trials, renal function, the potential for drug-drug interactions and preference for once- or twice-daily dosing. In addition, several 'special situations' were not adequately studied in the dedicated clinical trials. For these situations, knowledge of the unique pharmacological features of the various NOACs and judicious cross-trial comparison can help inform prescription choices. The purpose of this position article is therefore to help clinicians choose the right anticoagulant for the right patient at the right dose by reviewing a variety of special situations not widely studied in clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caterina et al. (2018) conducted a review in Heart Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Venous Thromboembolism. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and VTE treatment, with less intracranial bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: