Why the study?
How can non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants be individualized for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
How can non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants be individualized for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
NOACs provide an opportunity for individualized stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation based on patient-specific factors like renal function and age.
NOAC selection should be individualized by stroke/bleeding risk; extends pivotal trial data to European clinical decision-making.
Non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as alternatives to VKAs for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Four NOACS: dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban, have received regulatory approval in Europe from the European Medicines Agency. Numerous factors can influence the decision to prescribe a NOAC, the most important of which are assessment of stroke and bleeding risks. Given the variation in design of the pivotal phase III clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of NOACs, and in the absence of head-to-head comparative data, it is impossible to recommend one NOAC over the other. However, NOACS offer the opportunity for individualised therapy based on factors such as renal function, age or patient/doctor preference for once- or twice-daily dosing regimens. Dose reduction of some NOACS should be considered in at-risk patient populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Alings (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: