Key result
Dabigatran 110 mg twice daily did not significantly change the mean Hong Kong dyspepsia index from baseline to 4 weeks (12.9 vs 12.6; p=0.23), with only 0.9% discontinuing therapy due to dyspepsia.
Why the study?
Does dabigatran 110 mg twice daily worsen dyspepsia in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=115)
Does dabigatran 110 mg twice daily worsen dyspepsia in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 12.6% vs 12.9%
p-value: p=0.23
Worsening of dyspepsia and subsequent drug discontinuation are uncommon with dabigatran 110 mg twice daily when correct administration instructions are provided.
Supports short-term tolerability of dabigatran 110 mg BID regarding dyspepsia; leaves open confirmation in randomized settings.
BACKGROUND: Dabigatran, a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, has been shown to prevent stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Nonetheless, studies show that 10%-30% of those prescribed dabigatran experience dyspepsia that may eventually lead to discontinuation of therapy and loss of clinical benefit. AIM: To evaluate the gastrointestinal tolerability of dabigatran utilizing a validated questionnaire, as well as determining subsequent non-compliance and drug discontinuation. METHOD: This is an observational study. All patients were assessed by a validated questionnaire, Hong Kong dyspepsia index, prior to drug prescription and again 4 weeks later. RESULTS: In this study, 115 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (mean age: 74.6 ± 11.4 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.39 ± 1.59) were prescribed dabigatran. At baseline, the mean Hong Kong dyspepsia index was 12.9 ± 1.6 and nine patients had significant dyspepsia (Hong Kong dyspepsia index ⩾ 16). After 4 weeks, the mean Hong Kong dyspepsia index was similar at 12.6 ± 1.9 (p = 0.23). There was no change in Hong Kong dyspepsia index after initiation of dabigatran in 59 (51.3%) patients, and improvement in 37 (32.2%). Only 19 (16.5%) patients had worsening of Hong Kong dyspepsia index, and among these 19 patients, only 1 patient (0.9%) discontinued dabigatran due to significant dyspepsia. CONCLUSION: Worsening of dyspepsia with dabigatran 110 mg twice daily was uncommon with correct drug administration and clear instructions provided. Systematic assessment of dyspeptic symptoms using a validated questionnaire (i.e. Hong Kong dyspepsia index) before and after treatment initiation allows a more objective comparison of dyspeptic symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2016) conducted an observational in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=115). Dabigatran vs. Baseline was evaluated on Hong Kong dyspepsia index (p=0.23). Dabigatran 110 mg twice daily did not significantly change the mean Hong Kong dyspepsia index from baseline to 4 weeks (12.9 vs 12.6; p=0.23), with only 0.9% discontinuing therapy due to dyspepsia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: