Key result
Myocardial perfusion imaging scan scores positively correlated with the number of affected vessels on coronary angiography (r = 0.501, P = 0.001), though MPI showed <50% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Does myocardial perfusion imaging accurately correlate with invasive coronary angiography for the diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina?
Cross-Sectional (n=155)
No
Does myocardial perfusion imaging accurately correlate with invasive coronary angiography for the diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina?
Effect estimate: r = 0.501
p-value: p=0.001
Myocardial perfusion imaging correlates positively with invasive coronary angiography findings but demonstrates suboptimal sensitivity (<50%) for detecting significant coronary stenosis in patients with stable angina.
MPI findings in stable angina warrant cautious interpretation; leaves open diagnostic accuracy versus angiography pending prospective validation.
Background: Non-invasive and cost effective treatments of coronary artery disease (CAD) are a health priority and a current necessity. Objectives: This study aimed at comparing the results of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with coronary angiography findings in the diagnosis of CAD. Methods: This cross sectional study included 155 patients with stable angina, who were referred to Kowsar hospital, Semnan, Iran, from May 2013 to April 2014. After confirmation of positive perfusion imaging, angiography was performed within 3 months. Myocardial perfusion imaging results were categorized as mild, moderate and severe, and also in coronary angiography, narrowing of more than 50% of the vessels was considered as significant stenosis. Results: Mean age was 58.3 ± 11.5 and 82 (52.9%) of the participants were male. According to MPI, the lateral wall of the myocardia (44.5%) was the most common affected area. Abnormal angiographic findings were reported in 47.7% (n = 74) of the patients. The number of affected vessels in the angiography had a positive correlation with the scan score (r = 0.501 and P = 0.001). The MPI had less than 50% sensitivity and more than 72% specificity. Conclusions: This study indicated that MPI and coronary angiography findings had a positive correlation. The sensitivity of MPI was less than optimal, and it may be better if supplemented by other diagnostic techniques for diagnosis CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eskandarian et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable angina (n=155). Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) vs. Invasive coronary angiography was evaluated on Correlation between MPI scan score and number of affected vessels in angiography (r = 0.501, p=0.001). Myocardial perfusion imaging scan scores positively correlated with the number of affected vessels on coronary angiography (r = 0.501, P = 0.001), though MPI showed <50% sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: