Key result
In patients with severe chronic heart failure, enalapril significantly increased left ventricular fractional shortening (P<0.05) and decreased the systolic time interval index over 6 weeks.
Why the study?
Does enalapril improve left ventricular function and neuroendocrine activation in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure?
RCT
randomized
Yes
Does enalapril improve left ventricular function and neuroendocrine activation in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure?
In patients with severe chronic heart failure, enalapril improves left ventricular systolic function and reduces neuroendocrine activation, though changes in individual hormones do not directly correlate with the degree of LV improvement.
May support short-term LV improvement with enalapril in severe HF; leaves open confirmation in randomized outcome trials.
Left ventricular (LV) function and plasma levels of cardiovascular hormones were examined in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), randomized to placebo or enalapril, in addition to conventional therapy. M-mode echocardiography and plasma hormone concentrations were available at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. There was a significant relationship between LV systolic function and levels of angiotensin-II and norepinephrine. Enalapril increased LV fractional shortening (FS%) (13.3 +/- 5.6 to 15.4 +/- 5.8, p < 0.05) and decreased the systolic time interval index (0.58 +/- 0.14 to 0.48 +/- 0.15, p < 0.05) concurrent with a significant decrease in angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and in aldosterone, angiotensin-II, and norepinephrine concentrations after 6 weeks. No changes were found in the placebo group. However, there was no direct relationship between the amount of change in neurohormones and improvement in LV function after 6 weeks. These findings indicate that in patients with severe chronic CHF, severe LV systolic dysfunction is associated with high plasma levels of angiotensin-II and norepinephrine, which can be favorably modified by enalapril. This may be of importance for prolonging life in severe heart failure. The lack of relationship between changes in individual hormones and systolic function suggests complex dynamic interaction. It is, therefore, not sufficient to predict changes in LV function by measuring changes in only one hormone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eriksson et al. (1994) conducted an RCT in Severe chronic congestive heart failure (CHF). Enalapril vs. Placebo was evaluated on Left ventricular fractional shortening (FS%) (Increased from 13.3 +/- 5.6 to 15.4 +/- 5.8, p=<0.05). In patients with severe chronic heart failure, enalapril significantly increased left ventricular fractional shortening (P<0.05) and decreased the systolic time interval index over 6 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: