Key result
Genetic inhibition of Ncx1 (retaining ≈20% of control NCX current) did not affect resting heart rate but significantly blunted heart rate increases in response to fight-or-flight stimuli.
Why the study?
Does genetic inhibition of NCX1 affect resting and stimulated heart rate in a mouse model?
Does genetic inhibition of NCX1 affect resting and stimulated heart rate in a mouse model?
NCX1 is essential for fight-or-flight heart rate responses but not for maintaining resting heart rate, highlighting its specific role in stress-induced pacemaking.
Ncx1 modulation of stress heart rate responses remains preclinical; leaves open translation to human arrhythmia therapies.
RATIONALE: The sodium-calcium exchanger 1 (NCX1) is predominantly expressed in the heart and is implicated in controlling automaticity in isolated sinoatrial node (SAN) pacemaker cells, but the potential role of NCX1 in determining heart rate in vivo is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of Ncx1 in heart rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used global myocardial and SAN-targeted conditional Ncx1 knockout (Ncx1(-/-)) mice to measure the effect of the NCX current on pacemaking activity in vivo, ex vivo, and in isolated SAN cells. We induced conditional Ncx1(-/-) using a Cre/loxP system. Unexpectedly, in vivo and ex vivo hearts and isolated SAN cells showed that basal rates in Ncx1(-/-) (retaining ≈20% of control level NCX current) and control mice were similar, suggesting that physiological NCX1 expression is not required for determining resting heart rate. However, increases in heart rate and SAN cell automaticity in response to isoproterenol or the dihydropyridine Ca(2+) channel agonist BayK8644 were significantly blunted or eliminated in Ncx1(-/-) mice, indicating that NCX1 is important for fight or flight heart rate responses. In contrast, the pacemaker current and L-type Ca(2+) currents were equivalent in control and Ncx1(-/-) SAN cells under resting and isoproterenol-stimulated conditions. Ivabradine, a pacemaker current antagonist with clinical efficacy, reduced basal SAN cell automaticity similarly in control and Ncx1(-/-) mice. However, ivabradine decreased automaticity in SAN cells isolated from Ncx1(-/-) mice more effectively than in control SAN cells after isoproterenol, suggesting that the importance of NCX current in fight or flight rate increases is enhanced after pacemaker current inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Physiological Ncx1 expression is required for increasing sinus rates in vivo, ex vivo, and in isolated SAN cells, but not for maintaining resting heart rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2012) studied this question. Conditional Ncx1 knockout vs. Control mice was evaluated on Heart rate and sinoatrial node cell automaticity. Genetic inhibition of Ncx1 (retaining ≈20% of control NCX current) did not affect resting heart rate but significantly blunted heart rate increases in response to fight-or-flight stimuli.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: