Key result
The SMART-AV trial is designed to randomize at least 950 heart failure patients to evaluate whether systematic AV delay optimization improves the relative change in LVESV at 6 months post-implant.
Why the study?
Does systematic AV delay optimization (SmartDelay or echocardiography) improve left ventricular remodeling compared to a fixed AV delay in heart failure patients receiving CRT-D?
RCT (n=950)
Double-blind
1:1:1 ratio using randomly permuted blocks
Yes
Does systematic AV delay optimization (SmartDelay or echocardiography) improve left ventricular remodeling compared to a fixed AV delay in heart failure patients receiving CRT-D?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The SMART-AV trial is designed to determine whether systematic AV delay optimization using electrogram-based algorithms or echocardiography improves left ventricular reverse remodeling compared to a fixed AV delay in patients receiving CRT-D.
BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with moderate-to-severely symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and ventricular conduction delay is established. However, some patients do not demonstrate clinical improvement following CRT. It is unclear whether systematic optimization of the programmed atrioventricular (AV) delay improves the rate of clinical response. METHODS: SMART-AV is a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, three-armed trial that will investigate the effects of optimizing AV delay timing in heart failure patients receiving CRT + defibrillator (CRT-D) therapy. A minimum of 950 patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using randomly permuted blocks within each center programmed to either DDD or DDDR with a lower rate of 60. The study will include echocardiographic measurements of volumes and function [e.g., left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV)], biochemical measurements of plasma biomarker profiles, and functional measurements (e.g., 6-minute hall walk) in CRT-D patients who are enrolled and randomized to fixed AV delay (i.e., 120 ms), AV delay determined by electrogram-based SmartDelay, or an AV delay determined by echocardiography (i.e., mitral inflow). Patients will be evaluated prior to initiation of CRT, 3 and 6 months post-implant. The primary endpoint is the relative change in LVESV at 6 months between the groups. Patient enrollment commenced in May 2008 and the study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. CONCLUSION: SMART-AV is a randomized, clinical trial designed to evaluate three different methods of AV delay optimization to determine whether systematic AV optimization is beneficial for patients receiving CRT for 6 months post-implant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steín et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=950). AV delay determined by electrogram-based SmartDelay or echocardiography vs. Fixed AV delay (120 ms) was evaluated on Relative change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 6 months. The SMART-AV trial is designed to randomize at least 950 heart failure patients to evaluate whether systematic AV delay optimization improves the relative change in LVESV at 6 months post-implant.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: