We report a case of a surgical site infection caused by clindamycin-susceptible, erythromycin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) that did not respond to treatment with clindamycin. The MRSA isolate obtained after treatment was resistant to clindamycin but was found to be identical by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to the clindamycin-susceptible isolate obtained before treatment. A post hoc erythromycin-induction test (D test) confirmed the presence of in vitro inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance (iMLS) in the pretreatment isolate. Erythromycin induction testing confirmed in vitro iMLS in 90 (56%) of 161 erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin-susceptible clinical S. aureus isolates overall and in a significantly higher proportion (78%) of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates from pediatric patients. Our clinical laboratory currently tests all S. aureus isolates for iMLS before reporting clindamycin susceptibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siberry et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: