Why the study?
Does routine screening for microalbuminuria improve risk stratification and cost-effectiveness in patients with primary hypertension compared to blood pressure levels alone?
Does routine screening for microalbuminuria improve risk stratification and cost-effectiveness in patients with primary hypertension compared to blood pressure levels alone?
Routine screening for microalbuminuria in primary hypertension offers a cost-effective method to identify high-risk patients with target organ damage.
Target organ damage assessment may refine risk stratification beyond BP levels; leaves optimal diagnostic techniques open.
BP levels per se may be an unreliable indicator of risk in the individual patient. In fact, the global cardiovascular profile, including the presence and degree of target organ damage, is a better predictor of future events and, therefore, should be used to choose both treatment and BP goals. However, the prevalence of target organ damage and therefore the percentage of patients who are at risk very much depends on the diagnostic techniques used. However, as a result of the high prevalence of hypertension and its financial impact on public health systems, limiting unnecessary and extensive diagnostic tests also should be a priority. The routine search for microalbuminuria may lead to the detection of a significantly greater percentage of patients who are at high risk while contributing the optimization of the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic workup in hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pontremoli et al. (2004) conducted a review in Primary Hypertension. Routine search for microalbuminuria was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: