Key result
MS-551 decreased susceptibility to ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in canine post-infarction models, but failed to inhibit coronary ligation or digitalis-induced arrhythmias.
Why the study?
Does MS-551 reduce susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias in canine models?
Does MS-551 reduce susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias in canine models?
MS-551 acts as a pure class III antiarrhythmic drug effective against reentrant tachyarrhythmias but not automaticity arrhythmias in canine models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports selective anti-reentrant effects in canine post-MI models; leaves open human translation and arrhythmia subtype specificity.
The antiarrhythmic effects of MS-551, which prolongs cardiac action potential duration without affecting the maximum upstroke velocity of the action potential, were assessed in three different canine ventricular arrhythmia models: 1) ventricular tachycardia (VT) induced by electrical stimuli 3–5 days after myocardial infarction, 2) spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias 24–48 hr after two-stage coronary ligation and 3) ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced by digitalis. Intravenous administration of MS-551 (0.1–1 mg/kg) decreased the susceptibility in 10 dogs out of 13 to VT or ventricular fibrillation evoked by programmed electrical stimulation (PES) delivered to the ventricular septum 3–5 days after myocardial infarction. Oral administration of MS-551 (3 mg/kg) also decreased the susceptibility to VT evoked by PES in 7 out of 10 conscious postinfarction dogs. Concurrently, intravenous (0.1–1 mg/kg) or oral (3 mg/kg) administration of MS-551 produced increases in the ventricular effective refractory periods (ERP) by 7 ± 1%–17 ± 3% or 13 ± 2%, respectively. Similarly, d-sotalol (0.3–3 mg/kg, i.v. and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) decreased the susceptibility to VT with increased ERP. However, MS-551 (1 and 10 mg/kg, i.v.) failed to inhibit both canine two-stage coronary ligation arrhythmia and digitalis arrhythmia. These results suggest that MS-551 is a pure class III antiarrhythmic drug which may be effective in the treatment of life-threatening reentrant tachyarrhythmias, but not in automaticity arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamiya et al. (1992) studied Ventricular arrhythmia. MS-551 vs. d-sotalol was evaluated on Susceptibility to ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. MS-551 decreased susceptibility to ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in canine post-infarction models, but failed to inhibit coronary ligation or digitalis-induced arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: