Key result
Establishing a daytime emergency operating theatre increased daytime and urgent surgeries performed within priority and reduced scheduled surgery cancellations, with unchanged 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
Acute abdominal surgery accounts for a substantial portion of hospital services and carries high morbidity and mortality rates.
Does the establishment of a daytime emergency operating theatre improve clinical outcomes or operational efficiency in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy?
Cohort
No
Does the establishment of a daytime emergency operating theatre improve clinical outcomes or operational efficiency in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy?
Establishing a daytime emergency operating theatre improves surgical timing and reduces cancellations of elective surgeries without negatively impacting mortality or length of stay.
Daytime emergency theatre introduction was associated with operational gains; leaves open effects on outcomes and need for prospective confirmation before wider adoption.
• After establishment of a daytime emergency operating theatre the total number of emergency laparotomies increased, and a higher proportion was performed during daytime hours. • A higher proportion of acute surgeries was requested with high priority, but nevertheless a higher proportion took place within priority. • More elderly patients underwent acute surgery. • The number of cancellations of scheduled surgeries was significantly reduced. • Key outcomes, including hospital length of stay, reoperation rates within seven days, and 30-day mortality remained unchanged. • The study highlights both the benefits and potential challenges of increasing surgical theatre availability. Acute abdominal surgery, constituting a substantial portion of hospital services, is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. This study aimed to compare two cohorts of emergency laparotomy surgeries: before (Cohort 1) and after (Cohort 2) the establishment of a regular daytime emergency operating theatre at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway. Data were collected from the hospital's operation planning and registration system and then merged with data from the hospital's electronic patient record system. The British National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. The study found an increase from Cohort 1 to Cohort 2 in the number of surgeries, and in the proportion of urgent surgeries, both requested and started, within 6 h. Results also showed a higher proportion of daytime surgeries in the latter cohort. More elderly patients were operated in Cohort 2, but the low 30-day mortality rate remained unchanged. Other key outcomes, such as length of hospital stay and reoperations within seven days, were also unchanged. The number of cancellations of scheduled surgery was significantly lower after a regular daytime emergency surgery room was available. While improvements were found, the study acknowledges potential challenges and costs associated with the increasing availability of surgical theatres. The findings contribute to ongoing discussions on optimizing acute abdominal surgery pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordvoll et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Emergency laparotomy. Daytime emergency operating theatre vs. Before establishment of the daytime emergency operating theatre was evaluated on Hospital length of stay, reoperation rates within seven days, and 30-day mortality. Establishing a daytime emergency operating theatre increased daytime and urgent surgeries performed within priority and reduced scheduled surgery cancellations, with unchanged 30-day mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: