Key result
Cardiac rhythm management devices provide expanding diagnostic information that may transform standards of care through individualized treatment, despite a current lack of solid clinical data.
Understanding the monitoring capabilities of modern cardiac rhythm management devices is crucial for electrophysiologists to provide individualized patient care.
Device diagnostics merit cautious clinical consideration; leaves open prospective trials to validate individualized strategies.
Since the advent of the first generation pacemakers, solely providing rate support, we have witnessed a technological outburst in the type and complexity of implantable devices. The introduction of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and later of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices enriched our therapeutic arsenal for the management of patients with heart failure and/or high risk of sudden cardiac death. In addition, during the last decade, newer generation cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMs) have been capable to provide a continuously expanding pool of diagnostic information derived by novel monitoring capabilities. Although at present the clinical role of this information is undervalued, it is evident that the clinical exploitation of data derived by CRMs may transform the standards of care for our patients by providing timely applied individualized diagnosis and treatment. In this context, even in the absence of solid data supporting the use of this information in everyday clinical practice, improving our familiarity with currently available monitoring algorithms is a prerequisite for the electrophysiologist who keeps in pace with the rapidly evolving technologies of CRMs and is prepared for their future role on clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrikopoulos et al. (2009) conducted a review in Heart failure and/or high risk of sudden cardiac death. Cardiac rhythm management devices was evaluated. Cardiac rhythm management devices provide expanding diagnostic information that may transform standards of care through individualized treatment, despite a current lack of solid clinical data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: