Key result
Veterans undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in the community had significantly higher rates of postoperative infections (17% vs 0%) and 30-day emergency department utilization (22% vs 5%) compared to those treated within the VHA.
Why the study?
Use of Veterans Health Administration funded community care has rapidly increased, but systematic evaluations of surgery-specific metrics such as perioperative complications, mortality, and timeliness of care were lacking.
Does community care CABG compared to VHA CABG improve perioperative outcomes and 30-day emergency department utilization in Veterans?
Cohort (n=78)
No
Does community care CABG compared to VHA CABG improve perioperative outcomes and 30-day emergency department utilization in Veterans?
Absolute Event Rate: 17% vs 0%
p-value: p=0.008
May warrant caution when referring veterans for community CABG; leaves open whether outcomes differ from VHA care.
For Veterans who cannot be seen in a timely fashion or must travel long distances to be seen, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) offers funded care in the community. The use of this program has rapidly increased; however, there have been no systematic evaluations of surgery specific metrics such as perioperative complications, mortality and timeliness of care. To evaluate this in cardiac surgery patients, we compared veterans undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in the community to those remaining within the VHA. We identified 78 patients during calendar year 2018 meeting inclusion criteria. 41 underwent surgery in the community versus 37 in the VHA. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics including age, sex, race, ethnicity, comorbidities and surgical risk scores. With regard to perioperative outcomes, veterans who underwent surgery within the VHA had lower infection rates (17% vs. 0%, p = 0.008) and 30-day emergency department utilization (22% vs. 5%, p = 0.04). A longer median postoperative inpatient stay was also seen within the VHA (8 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the VHA may better serve Veterans and prevent adverse events after CABG, at the expense of prolonged hospitalization. More study is needed to validate the findings of this pilot study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotton et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring CABG (n=78). Community care vs. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care was evaluated on Postoperative infections (p=0.008). Veterans undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in the community had significantly higher rates of postoperative infections (17% vs 0%) and 30-day emergency department utilization (22% vs 5%) compared to those treated within the VHA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: