Key result
Administration of intravenous hydralazine or labetalol in hospitalized patients was associated with significantly longer hospital length of stay compared to those who did not receive a dose (P<.001).
Why the study?
Does the administration of as-needed intravenous hydralazine or labetalol affect hospital length of stay in inpatients with acute blood pressure elevations?
Observational (n=2,189)
Does the administration of as-needed intravenous hydralazine or labetalol affect hospital length of stay in inpatients with acute blood pressure elevations?
The administration of as-needed IV antihypertensives for inpatient blood pressure elevation is common but associated with increased hospital length of stay, highlighting a critical need for evidence-based guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
IV hydralazine or labetalol administration was associated with longer stays; leaves open causality versus confounding and requires prospective trials.
Acute blood pressure elevations are commonly treated in hospitalized patients. There are no guidelines for appropriate practice and no evidence that such treatment is useful. The authors performed a retrospective review of medical and pharmacy records to determine how often intravenous hydralazine and labetalol are ordered and administered. During a 1-year study period, a total of 29,545 hospitalizations were recorded. The authors identified 2189 patients (7.4% of all patients) for whom 7242 orders were written for hydralazine as needed (10-20 mg per dose) and 5915 for labetalol (10-20 mg per dose). Ordered drugs were administered in 60.3% of patients, and the average number of doses administered was 5.3+/-8.2 (mean +/- SD) for hydralazine and 5.6+/-7.7 for labetalol. Hospital length of stay (LOS) for patients for whom hydralazine was ordered was 12.0+/-15.9 days for those who received at least 1 dose and 7.1+/-9.0 days for those who did not receive a dose (P<.001). For patients for whom labetalol was ordered, patients receiving at least 1 dose had an LOS of 11.8+/-16.1 days vs 7.9+/-10.4 days for those who did not receive a dose (P<.001). Treatment of elevated blood pressure in in-patients is a common practice. The authors suggest that evidence is needed to determine whether the practice is of benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weder et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Acute blood pressure elevations (n=2,189). Intravenous hydralazine or labetalol vs. Patients who had orders but did not receive a dose was evaluated on Hospital length of stay (days) for patients ordered hydralazine (p=<.001). Administration of intravenous hydralazine or labetalol in hospitalized patients was associated with significantly longer hospital length of stay compared to those who did not receive a dose (P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: