Key result
The nnU-Net V2 machine learning model integrated into TriDFusion achieved an overall mean efficiency of 90.43% for automated brown adipose tissue segmentation on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans.
Why the study?
Manual identification and segmentation of brown adipose tissue on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans is time-consuming and prone to observer bias, creating a need for automated detection.
Does an nnU-Net V2 machine learning model accurately segment brown adipose tissue on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans compared to physician review?
Observational (n=435)
No
Does an nnU-Net V2 machine learning model accurately segment brown adipose tissue on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans compared to physician review?
An nnU-Net V2 machine learning model can achieve approximately 90% accuracy in automating the segmentation of brown adipose tissue on PET/CT scans.
Supports automated BAT segmentation feasibility; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in machine learning have revolutionized medical imaging. Currently, identifying brown adipose tissue (BAT) relies on manual identification and segmentation on Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scans. However, the process is time-consuming, especially for studies involving a large number of cases, and is subject to bias due to observer dependency. The introduction of machine learning algorithms, such as the PET/CT algorithm implemented in the TriDFusion (3DF) Image Viewer, represents a significant advancement in BAT detection. In the context of cancer care, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven BAT detection holds immense promise for rapid and automatic differentiation between malignant lesions and non-malignant BAT confounds. By leveraging machine learning to discern intricate patterns in imaging data, this study aims to advance the automation of BAT recognition and provide precise quantitative assessment of radiographic features. RESULTS: We used a semi-automatic, threshold-based 3DF workflow to segment 317 PET/CT scans containing BAT. To minimize manual edits, we defined exclusion zones via machine-learning-based CT organ segmentation and used those organ masks to assign each volume of interest (VOI) to its anatomical site. Three physicians then reviewed and corrected all segmentations using the 3DF contour panel. The final, edited masks were used to train an nnU-Net V2 model, which we subsequently applied to 118 independent PET/CT scans. Across all anatomical sites, physicians reviewed the network’s automated segmentations to be approximately 90% accurate. CONCLUSION: Although nnU-Net V2 effectively identified BAT from PET/CT scans, training an AI model capable of perfect BAT segmentation remains a challenge due to factors such as PET/CT misregistration and the absence of visible BAT activity across contiguous slices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lafontaine et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cancer (patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT) (n=435). nnU-Net V2 machine learning model using TriDFusion (3DF) vs. Physician manual review was evaluated on Accuracy of automated brown adipose tissue segmentation across anatomical sites. The nnU-Net V2 machine learning model integrated into TriDFusion achieved an overall mean efficiency of 90.43% for automated brown adipose tissue segmentation on 18F-FDG PET/CT scans.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: